A Normal C Reactive Protein and Significant Bacterial Infection in Literature review

A Normal C Reactive Protein and Significant Bacterial Infection in Children with Fever - Literature review Example One of the most common reasons for Emergency Department (ED) visit is the fever. Fever accounts to approximately 10 – 35% of admissions in children younger than three years of age (Nuttall, 2003; Andreola et al., 2007; Behjati 2008; Liu et al, 2008). In this age group, severe bacterial infections or SBI represents to about 10 – 25%; however, Andreola et al (2007) noted that this diagnosis is frequently confusing especially with the absence of localising findings. Hence, a need for specific and sensitive laboratory markers for infection is required because of the presence of clinical findings such as body temperature. More than a decade ago, an algorithm which incorporates with laboratory findings, such as white blood cell count and absolute neutrophil count was published and was proven to be useful in the medical practice especially in the identification children who are at higher risk of severe bacterial illness. Additional markers such as C – reactive protein ( CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) are maybe useful (Nuttall, 2003; Andreola et al, 2007). In 1930, CRP is discovered by Tillett and Francis as C – Polysaccharide fraction called as fraction C from the sera of an acutely ill patient. In 1941, fraction C was found to be a peptide instead of a polysaccharide, thus renamed as C reactive peptide. In 1950, it was reported that CRP can be detected in more than 70 types of disorders. Carlan added that CRP can be normal in invasive bacterial disease, and produces the largest, the most rapid, and most quantifiable acute response to inflammation and infection.

Germany Class Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Germany Class - Essay Example Could they have invented their stories to bring the Germans in a bad light? If so, for what reason would they do so? There are a lot of questions raised in this quest for the truth whether in favor of the Germans or the Jews but what matters is not who a researcher is inclined to support but that, the aim of every researcher should be to dig out and expose nothing but the truth. In the interview of David Cole with Dr. Franciszek Piper (youtube.com), the interviewer cleared himself to be a Jew who claims to be an atheist but still respects and have nothing against his being a Jew. His cultural background may acquire him the benefit of the doubt for being fair in his inclinations about the subject matter however there are other matters that would still need to be considered. For instance, could there be a possibility that the concentration camps and gas chambers been altered to support the claims of the modern Germans? No one may be able to prove what really happened but thinking things over, what could be a stronger evidence against the testimonies of prisoners who survived the